Biowaste upcycling into second-generation microbial protein through mixed-culture fermentation

• Tyczewska A.
• et al.

Towards food security: current state and future prospects of agrobiotechnology.

Trends Biotechnol. 2018; 36: 1219-1229

• Qiu B.
• et al.

How cropland losses shaped by unbalanced urbanization process?.

Land Use Policy. 2020; 96104715

• Searchinger T.
• et al.

Creating a Sustainable Food Future. A Menu of Solutions to Sustainably Feed more than 9 Billion People by 2050, World Resources Report 2019.

World Resources Institute, 2019

The Future of Food and Agriculture – Trends and Challenges.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2017

• Henchion M.
• et al.

Future protein supply and demand: strategies and factors influencing a sustainable equilibrium.

Foods. 2017; 6: 53

• Chen D.M.C.
• et al.

The world’s growing municipal solid waste: trends and impacts.

Environ. Res. Lett. 2020; 15074021

• Boye J.I.
• Arcand Y.

Current trends in green technologies in food production and processing.

Food Eng. Rev. 2013; 5: 1-17

• Cobo S.
• et al.

From linear to circular integrated waste management systems: a review of methodological approaches.

Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2018; 135: 279-295

• Adegbeye M.J.
• et al.

Sustainable agriculture options for production, greenhouse gasses and pollution alleviation, and nutrient recycling in emerging and transitional nations – an overview.

J. Clean. Prod. 2020; 242118319

• Javourez U.
• et al.

Waste-to-nutrition: a review of current and emerging conversion pathways.

Biotechnol. Adv. 2021; 53107857

• Research and Markets

Protein Extracts from Single Cell Protein Sources Market by Source, by Application, by Geography – Global Market Size, Share, Development, Growth and Demand Forecast, 2013–2023.

Research and Markets, 2018

• Morach B.
• et al.

Food for thought: the protein transformation.

Ind. Biotechnol. 2021; 17: 125-133

• Matassa S.
• et al.

Microbial protein: future sustainable food supply route with low environmental footprint.

Microb. Biotechnol. 2016; 9: 568-575

• Pikaar I.
• et al.

Microbes and the next nitrogen revolution.

Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017; 51: 7297-7303

• Ghosh S.
• et al.

Mixed consortia in bioprocesses: role of microbial interactions.

Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016; 100: 4283-4295

• Diender M.
• et al.

Synthetic co-cultures: novel avenues for bio-based processes.

Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2021; 67: 72-79

• Khoshnevisan B.
• et al.

Environmental life cycle assessment of different biorefinery platforms valorizing municipal solid waste to bioenergy, microbial protein, lactic and succinic acid.

Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2020; 117109493

• Van Peteghem L.
• et al.

Towards new carbon-neutral food systems: combining carbon capture and utilization with microbial protein production.

Bioresour. Technol. 2022; 349126853

• Matassa S.
• et al.

Upcycling of biowaste carbon and nutrients in line with consumer confidence: the ‘full gas’ route to single cell protein.

Green Chem. 2020; 22: 4912-4929

• Khoshnevisan B.
• et al.

Urban biowaste valorization by coupling anaerobic digestion and single cell protein production.

Bioresour. Technol. 2019; 290121743

• Upadhyaya S.
• et al.

Microbial protein: a valuable component for future food security.

in: Singh J.S. Singh D.P. Microbes and Environmental Management. Studium Press, 2016: 260-279

• Nasseri A.T.
• et al.

Single cell protein: production and process.

Am. J. Food Technol. 2011; 6: 103-116

• Pikaar I.
• et al.

Decoupling livestock from land use through industrial feed production pathways.

Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018; 52: 7351-7359

• Ukaegbu-obi K.

Single cell protein: a resort to global protein challenge and waste management.

J. Microbiol. Microb. Technol. 2016; 1: 5

• Matassa S.
• et al.

Direct nitrogen stripping and upcycling from anaerobic digestate during conversion of cheese whey into single cell protein.

Bioresour. Technol. 2022; 358127308

• Yang Z.
• et al.

Bioconversion of apple pomace into microbial protein feed based on extrusion pretreatment.

Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2021; 194: 1496-1509

• Aggelopoulos T.
• et al.

Solid state fermentation of food waste mixtures for single cell protein, aroma volatiles and fat production.

Food Chem. 2014; 145: 710-716

• Vethathirri R.S.
• et al.

Microbial community-based protein production from wastewater for animal feed applications.

Bioresour. Technol. 2021; 341125723

• Sakarika M.
• et al.

Purple non-sulphur bacteria and plant production: benefits for fertilization, stress resistance and the environment.

Microb. Biotechnol. 2020; 13: 1336-1365

• Yang Z.
• et al.

Bio-electrochemically extracted nitrogen from residual resources for microbial protein production.

Bioresour. Technol. 2021; 337125353

• Hülsen T.
• et al.

Simultaneous treatment and single cell protein production from agri-industrial wastewaters using purple phototrophic bacteria or microalgae – a comparison.

Bioresour. Technol. 2018; 254: 214-223

• Acosta N.
• et al.

Microbial protein production from methane via electrochemical biogas upgrading.

Chem. Eng. J. 2020; 391123625

• LaTurner Z.W.
• et al.

Single cell protein production from food waste using purple non-sulfur bacteria shows economically viable protein products have higher environmental impacts.

J. Clean. Prod. 2020; 276123114

• Voutilainen E.
• et al.

Economic comparison of food protein production with single-cell organisms from lignocellulose side-streams.

Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 2021; 14100683

Fixation of carbon dioxide by a hydrogen-oxidizing bacterium for value-added products.

World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018; 34: 89

Making the case for edible microorganisms as an integral part of a more sustainable and resilient food production system.

Food Secur. 2019; 11: 265-278

• Tsapekos P.
• et al.

Methane oxidising bacteria to upcycle effluent streams from anaerobic digestion of municipal biowaste.

J. Environ. Manag. 2019; 251109590

• Xu M.
• et al.

Sulfide restrains the growth of Methylocapsa acidiphila converting renewable biogas to single cell protein.

Water Res. 2020; 184116138

• Xu M.
• et al.

Biogas upgrading and valorization to single-cell protein in a bioinorganic electrosynthesis system.

Chem. Eng. J. 2021; 426131837

• Verbeeck K.
• et al.

Assessing the potential for up-cycling recovered resources from anaerobic digestion through microbial protein production.

Microb. Biotechnol. 2021; 14: 897-910

• Molitor B.
• et al.

Power-to-protein: converting renewable electric power and carbon dioxide into single cell protein with a two-stage bioprocess.

Energy Environ. Sci. 2019; 12: 3515-3521

• Matassa S.
• et al.

Autotrophic nitrogen assimilation and carbon capture for microbial protein production by a novel enrichment of hydrogen-oxidizing bacteria.

Water Res. 2016; 101: 137-146

• Leger D.
• et al.

Photovoltaic-driven microbial protein production can use land and sunlight more efficiently than conventional crops.

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2021; 118e2015025118

• De Vrieze J.
• et al.

Stochasticity in microbiology: managing unpredictability to reach the Sustainable Development Goals.

Microb. Biotechnol. 2020; 13: 829-843

• Johns N.I.
• et al.

Principles for designing synthetic microbial communities.

Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2016; 31: 146-153

• Tsoi R.
• et al.

Emerging strategies for engineering microbial communities.

Biotechnol. Adv. 2019; 37107372

• Asmamaw T.
• Fassil A.

Co-culture: a great promising method in single cell protein production.

Biotechnol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2014; 9: 12-20

• Zhang W.
• et al.

Enrichment of hydrogen-oxidizing bacteria with nitrate recovery as biofertilizers in the mixed culture.

Bioresour. Technol. 2020; 313123645

• Bothe H.
• et al.

Heterotrophic bacteria growing in association with Methylococcus capsulatus (Bath) in a single cell protein production process.

Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2002; 59: 33-39

• Zha X.
• et al.

Bioconversion of wastewater to single cell protein by methanotrophic bacteria.

Bioresour. Technol. 2021; 320124351

• Ho A.
• et al.

The more, the merrier: heterotroph richness stimulates methanotrophic activity.

ISME J. 2014; 8: 1945-1948

• Nunes J.J.
• et al.

Enhanced production of single cell protein from M. capsulatus (Bath) growing in mixed culture.

J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Food Sci. 2016; 6: 894-899

• Kerckhof F.M.
• et al.

From biogas and hydrogen to microbial protein through co-cultivation of methane and hydrogen oxidizing bacteria.

Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021; 9: 1-17

• Van Der Ha D.
• et al.

Conversion of biogas to bioproducts by algae and methane oxidizing bacteria.

Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012; 46: 13425-13431

• Roberts N.
• et al.

A microalgae-methanotroph coculture is a promising platform for fuels and chemical production from wastewater.

Front. Energy Res. 2020; 8: 1-14

• Hu X.
• et al.

Co-cultivation enhanced microbial protein production based on autotrophic nitrogen-fixing hydrogen-oxidizing bacteria.

Chem. Eng. J. 2021; 429132535

• Alloul A.
• et al.

Cocultivating aerobic heterotrophs and purple bacteria for microbial protein in sequential photo- and chemotrophic reactors.

Bioresour. Technol. 2021; 319124192

• Yadav J.S.S.
• et al.

Mixed culture of Kluyveromyces marxianus and Candida krusei for single-cell protein production and organic load removal from whey.

Bioresour. Technol. 2014; 164: 119-127

• Myint K.T.
• et al.

Isolation and identification of flower yeasts for the development of mixed culture to produce single-cell protein from waste milk.

Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 2020; 10100401

• Serba E.M.
• et al.

Production of peptides and amino acids from microbial biomass in food and feed industries: biotechnological aspects.

Foods Raw Mater. 2020; 8: 268-276

• Gao R.
• et al.

Microbial protein enrichment and treatment of winery residue from fungi and yeast by syntrophic fermentation.

IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2018; 171012035

• Zhu W.
• et al.

Bioconversion of yellow wine wastes into microbial protein via mixed yeast-fungus cultures.

Bioresour. Technol. 2020; 299122565

• Raziq A.
• et al.

Single cell protein (SCP) production and potential substrates: a comprehensive review.

Pure Appl. Biol. 2020; 9: 1743-1754

• Qin L.
• et al.

The mixed culture of microalgae Chlorella pyrenoidosa and yeast Yarrowia lipolytica for microbial biomass production.

Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2019; 42: 1409-1419

• Ciani M.
• et al.

Microbes: food for the future.

Foods. 2021; 972: 13-14

• Khanjani M.H.
• Sharifinia M.

Biofloc technology as a promising tool to improve aquaculture production.

Rev. Aquac. 2020; 12: 1836-1850

• El Abbadi S.H.
• Criddle C.S.

Engineering the Dark Food Chain.

Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019; 53: 2273-2287

• Matassa S.
• et al.

Resource recovery from used water: the manufacturing abilities of hydrogen-oxidizing bacteria.

Water Res. 2015; 68: 467-478

• García Martínez J.B.
• et al.

Potential of microbial protein from hydrogen for preventing mass starvation in catastrophic scenarios.

Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2021; 25: 234-247

• Lähteenmäki-Uutela A.
• et al.

Alternative proteins and EU food law.

Food Control. 2021; 130108336

• European Parliament and the Council of the EU

Directive 2002/32/EC of The European Parliament and of the Council of 7 May 2002 on Undesirable Substances in Animal Feed.

European Parliament, 2002

• European Parliament and the Council of the EU

Regulation (EC) No 767/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 on the Placing on the Market and Use of Feed.

European Parliament, 2009

• European Commission

Commission Regulation (EU) No 68/2013 of 16 January 2013 on the Catalogue of Feed Materials.

European Parliament, 2013

• European Parliament and the Council of the European Union

Regulation (EU) 2015/2283 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015 on Novel Foods, Amending Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Repealing Regulation (EC) No 258/97 etc.

European Parliament, 2015

• Spanoghe J.
• et al.

Storage, fertilization and cost properties highlight the potential of dried microbial biomass as organic fertilizer.

Microb. Biotechnol. 2020; 13: 1377-1389

• Pikaar I.
• et al.

Carbon emission avoidance and capture by producing in-reactor microbial biomass based food, feed and slow release fertilizer: potentials and limitations.

Sci. Total Environ. 2018; 644: 1525-1530

• Kantachote D.
• et al.

Biofertilizers from Rhodopseudomonas palustris strains to enhance rice yields and reduce methane emissions.

Appl. Soil Ecol. 2016; 100: 154-161

• Kunasundari B.
• et al.

Revisiting the single cell protein application of Cupriavidus necator H16 and recovering bioplastic granules simultaneously.

PLoS ONE. 2013; 8: 1-15

• Singha S.
• et al.

Novel bioplastic from single cell protein as a potential packaging material.

ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2021; 9: 6337-6346

• Garavand F.
• et al.

Improving the integrity of natural biopolymer films used in food packaging by crosslinking approach: a review.

Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017; 104: 687-707

• Ghanbarzadeh B.
• Oromiehi A.R.

Biodegradable biocomposite films based on whey protein and zein: barrier, mechanical properties and AFM analysis.

Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2008; 43: 209-215

• Ritala A.
• et al.

Single cell protein—state-of-the-art, Industrial landscape and patents 2001–2016.

Front. Microbiol. 2017; 8: 2009

• Anupama
• Ravindra P.

Value-added food: single cell protein.

Biotechnol. Adv. 2000; 18: 459-479

• Spiller M.
• et al.

Environmental impact of microbial protein from potato wastewater as feed ingredient: comparative consequential life cycle assessment of three production systems and soybean meal.

Water Res. 2020; 171115406

• Bratosin B.C.
• et al.

Single cell protein: a potential substitute in human and animal nutrition.

Sustainability. 2021; 13: 9284

• Hölker U.
• Lenz J.

Solid-state fermentation — are there any biotechnological advantages?.

Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2005; 8: 301-306

• Sharif M.
• et al.

Single cell protein: sources, mechanism of production, nutritional value and its uses in aquaculture nutrition.

Aquaculture. 2021; 531735885

• Barka A.
• Blecker C.

Microalgae as a potential source of single-cell proteins. A review.

Biotechnol. Agron. Soc. Environ. 2016; 20: 427-436

• Jones S.W.
• et al.

Recent advances in single cell protein use as a feed ingredient in aquaculture.

Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2020; 61: 189-197

• Alloul A.
• et al.

Purple bacteria as added-value protein ingredient in shrimp feed: Penaeus vannamei growth performance, and tolerance against Vibrio and ammonia stress.

Aquaculture. 2021; 530735788

• Matassa S.
• et al.

Can direct conversion of used nitrogen to new feed and protein help feed the world?.

Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015; 49: 5247-5254

• Murrell J.C.

The aerobic methane oxidizing bacteria (Methanotrophs).

in: Timmis K.N. Handbook of Hydrocarbon and Lipid Microbiology. Springer, 2010: 1954-1966

• Jones S.W.
• et al.

CO2 fixation by anaerobic non-photosynthetic mixotrophy for improved carbon conversion.

Nat. Commun. 2016; 7: 12800

• Dou J.
• et al.

Autotrophic, heterotrophic, and mixotrophic nitrogen assimilation for single-cell protein production by two hydrogen-oxidizing bacterial strains.

Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2010; 187: 338-351

• Pihlajaniemi V.
• et al.

Comparison of pretreatments and cost-optimization of enzymatic hydrolysis for production of single cell protein from grass silage fibre.

Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 2020; 9100357

• Tsapekos P.
• et al.

Proteinaceous methanotrophs for feed additive using biowaste as carbon and nutrients source.

Bioresour. Technol. 2020; 313123646